لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

a hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's effortless for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got reached to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's achieved such stage. Read more

4.  It's been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of someday inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness on the alleged event as well as the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place for being the real brothers with the deceased but they didn't respond whatsoever towards the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of events that extra judicial confession of an accused is often a weak type of evidence which can be manoeuvred by the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is additionally depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light on the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners jointly on a motorcycle at four.

Deterrence: The panic of severe effects, including capital punishment, is meant to discourage potential criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.

Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to think about the benefit of all of the qualified candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of suitable candidates who will be found to generally be most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded by the respondent department just to extend favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part of your respondent department.

The issue here is that an accused may possibly say that they intended to injure the sufferer, but they did not intend to eliminate them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.

9.  Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.

The legislation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure get more info in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..

The scrupulous reader may have noticed some thing over: a flaw. Past the first seven words, the definition focuses on the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two simple elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “

In order to prove murder, there must be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition for the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Enhancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) with the Pakistan Constitution presents initial jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and identified scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.